It is widely believed that stretching
the back, and increasing the range of motion is beneficial, and reduces back
problems – however the scientific evidence shows that, on average, those who
have more range of motion in their backs have a greater risk of future
troubles. Clearly there is a tradeoff between mobility and stability where the
optimal balance is a very personal and individual variable. Indeed, the “stability/mobility balance” may shift
during a progressive exercise program as symptoms resolve, or with advancing
age, or as rehab/training objectives change.Another generally perceived goal of
training the back is to increase strength, believing in the “no pain-no gain” philosophy. Strength has little
association with low back health, in fact, many hurt their backs in an attempt
to increase strength. It could be argued that this is an artifact, in that
exercise programs intended to enhance strength contained poorly chosen exercises such as sit-2 ups. Performing situps both replicates a potent injury mechanism (specifically posterior disc
herniation) and results in high loads on the spine. On the other hand, muscle endurance, as opposed to strength, has been shown to be protective for future troubles. Further, for many,
it is better to train for stability rather than stretching to increase range of motion.
exercise programs intended to enhance strength contained poorly chosen exercises such as sit-2 ups. Performing situps both replicates a potent injury mechanism (specifically posterior disc
herniation) and results in high loads on the spine. On the other hand, muscle endurance, as opposed to strength, has been shown to be protective for future troubles. Further, for many,
it is better to train for stability rather than stretching to increase range of motion.
No comments:
Post a Comment